Forums | Hello Guest, Login or Register | > > L4Y Files: No longer here! < <

Hot Topics Hanging on L4Y Closing Down anyone here Crackdown 3's geomod Roll-Call. Who's still... R.I.P Sir Lots-A-Pot Server maps? Red Faction for Mac Who's still here? Run Event December 27th!   Online Goodness There are 0 users and 2 guests online     Levels-4-You : Lounge : Your Windows Vista/7 performance index [Forum Rules]   Page 2 Multiple Page Topic : 1 2  Back to Forum Thread List Garner    Posted 31st Oct 2009 10:20pm Post 3986 / 4125 5.8 under 7 on my laptop, was 5.6 under Vista. 3DMark06 showed about 450 point improvement over Vista on exactly the same hardware. I've also gained about an extra half an hour battery life with 7 over that of Vista. Certainly a lot more efficient. "Science is this extraordinary transnational, transcultural, trans-everything language which is the only way to discover Truth and its regrettable that billions are still stuck in the Middle Ages believing the crap propagated by Popes and priests..." - Peter Atkins     RED-FROG   Posted 3rd May 2010 4:41pm L4Y Resident Post 5131 / 5258 (AMD Phenom II 955BE, HD5870 stock-OCed, 4GB RAM, intel 80GB x-25) (27.10.2009: 7,3 - 7,5 - 7,5 - 7,5 - 7,3) Not much changed in the statistics However I have a new HD5870 now, and the Sata6G ASUS PCIe card, which may be the reason for the even better SSD speed. Even when I overclock my quadcore from 3,2Ghz to crazy 3,9Ghz (that is +4x700mhz), I get the same CPU results. Something must be wrong there. Probably it's just looking for the CPU name? I wonder what the AMD Phenom II X6 1090T does there. Yeah..kinda fake. Even with 2Ghz I get a rating of 7,3 for the CPU. Looks like the software checks the id of the hardware (which has hardcoded ratings) and does some testing afterwards. ¤ MARS WARS 3! - Red Faction revamped on the unreal engine. Superiority ¤    Modified May 3rd, 04:55pm by RED-FROG Page 2 Multiple Page Topic : 1 2

Copyright © 2000-2025 Levels-4-You Your request was handled in 0.05 seconds.